Published at : 24 May 2019
Volume : IJtech
Vol 10, No 3 (2019)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v10i3.2929
Mulyazmi | Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Bung Hatta Padang, Padang, West Sumatera 25586, Indonesia |
Wan R.W. Daud | Fuel Cell Institute, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Darul Ehsan, Malaysia |
Elly D. Rahman | Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Bung Hatta Padang, Padang, West Sumatera 25586, Indonesia |
Purwantika | Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Bung Hatta Padang, Padang, West Sumatera 25586, Indonesia |
Putri A. Mulya | Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Bung Hatta Padang, Padang, West Sumatera 25586, Indonesia |
Nia G. Sari | Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Bung Hatta Padang, Padang, West Sumatera 25586, Indonesia |
Management of the water in the stack is
a major problem in achieving optimal performance of a Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) fuel cell. One of the problems caused by
water imbalance in the PEM system is the formation of liquid water on the side
of the cathode. High water content in the PEM fuel cell stack causes
liquid water and flooding, and decreases its performance. The presence of
liquid water on the cathode side of the fuel cell leads to a decrease in the
amount of oxygen reacting in the catalyst layer. The results of this study
indicate that a general increase in water content results in a decrease in the
performance of PEM fuel cell systems.
The highest water content occurs at a current density of 0.9, with Rha
and RHc of 90%.
In this condition, system performance is relatively stable
at 0.67 volts, with 0.00016 gr/cm2 of liquid water content produced. Above this water content, system performance decreases
significantly.
Liquid water; Performance; Proton exchange membrane; Relative humidity
Development of the design system process to improve the performance of PEM
systems is currently still being undertaken. The aim is to obtain good fuel cell stack durability and high system
efficiency (Kaluža et al.,
2015). A single cell PEM fuel
cell in the form of an Electrolyte Membrane Assembly (MEA) is arranged like a
sandwich between two bipolar plates. The MEA consists of two electrodes; the anode and
cathode are separated by a proton conducting membrane. In the anodic membrane
interface, hydrogen is oxidized and the resulting protons are transported
through the membrane. In the cathode interface, oxygen is reduced and then produces
water, which flows out through the gas flow channel. Systems on stack PEM fuel cells are formed and arranged from many single
cells that create a balanced operating system.
The balance of the amount
of water content in the system is one of the most important factors that always
needs to be controlled in the PEM fuel cell. The purpose is to ensure the membranes in the stack are always hydrated.
The
membrane system on the stack fuel cell will be dry and cracked if the water
content is very low. Furthermore, if the water content is too high in the fuel cell system, condensation and flooding will occur
on the cathode side (Falcão et al., 2009). Situations related to the transfer of water
content in the system are include electro-osmotic drag (EOD) from the anode to
the cathode side; diffusion of water back from the cathode to the anode side; and a process of liquid
water formation on the anode and cathode side (Kraytsberg &
Ein-Eli, 2006).
EOD is the transport of protons together with water molecules passing through the membrane from the anode to the cathode side in the stack fuel cell. Water that migrates with protons will join with the water generated by electrochemical reaction and accumulate on the cathode side. Back diffusion in the fuel cell system occurs if there is a gradient between the amounts of water from the anode to the cathode side. The presence of water in PEM fuel cells has good and bad effects. On one side of the water needed to ensure good conductivity of the membrane proton, but the other side of the water can block the flow of reactants moving to the surface of the catalyst to react. If the proton exchange membrane is dry, protons cannot migrate, so ionic conductivity is low (Guvelioglu & Stenger, 2007). Another influence is blocking of the access of protons to the catalyst surface (Liu et al., 2006a; Liu et al., 2006b). Although flooding can occur on both sides of the electrode (anode and cathode) fuel cell system, floods that occur at the cathode can have a serious effect, because the oxygen
Water management in PEMFC system
operation is one of the important factors in avoiding reduced performance and
improving cell resilience. This research
shows that
optimal liquid water content flowing out from the cathode side of the PEM fuel cell system occurs at 90% Rha
and Rhc and with current density at 0.9 mA/cm2.
The performance of the system decreases significantly at 75%
Rhc if the liquid water content flowing out of the side of the cathode is above
0.00013 gr/cm2. Conversely, if the liquid water is below 0.00013
gr/cm2 system performance is relatively stable at 0.7 volts.
The authors would like to thank the University of Bung Hatta (UBH) and Ministry of Research,
Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia for supporting the project through
a Penelitian Dasar Unggulan Perguruan Tinggi (PDUPT) 2018 research grant Pendidikan Tinggi
No: 114/SP2H/LH/DPRM/2018 with contract No. 001/K10/KM/Kontrak-penelitian/2018.
Amirinejad, M., Rowshanzamir, S., Eikani, M.H., 2006. Effects of Perating Parameters on Performance of a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel
Cell. Journal of Power Sources, Volume 161(2), pp. 872–875
Cai, Y., Hu, J., Ma, H., Yi,
B., Zhang, H., 2006. Effect of
Water Transport Properties on a PEM Fuel Cell Operating with Dry Hydrogen. Electrochimica Acta, Volume 51(28), pp. 6361–6366
Falcão, D.S., Oliveira, V.B., Rangel, C.M., Pinho, C., Pinto, A.M.F.R., 2009. Water Transport through a PEM Fuel Cell: A One-dimensional
Model with Heat Transfer Effects. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 64(9), pp. 2216–2225
Gao,
F., Blunier, B., Miraoui, A., El-Moudni, A., 2010. Proton Exchange
Membrane Fuel Cell Multi-physical Dynamics and Stack Spatial Non-homogeneity
Analyses. Journal of Power Sources, Volume 195(22),
pp. 7609–7626
Guvelioglu, G.H., Stenger, H.G.,
2007. Flow Rate and Humidification Effects on a PEM Fuel Cell
Performance and Operation. Journal of
Power Sources, Volume 163(2), pp. 882–891
Hassan, N.S.M., Daud, W.R.W., Sopian, K., Sahari, J., 2009. Water Management in a Single Cell Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with
a Serpentine Flow Field. Journal of Power Sources, Volume 193(1), pp. 249–257
Kaluža,
L., Larsen, M.J., Zdražil,
M., Gulková, D., Odgaardb, M.,
2015. Fuel Cell Platinum Catalysts Supported on Mediate Surface Area Carbon Black Supports. Chemical Engineering Transactions, Volume 43(6), pp. 913–918
Kraytsberg,
A., Ein-Eli, Y., 2006. PEM FC with Improved Water Management. Journal of Power Sources, Volume 160(1), pp.194–201
Li, X., Sabir, I.,
2005. Review of Bipolar Plates in PEM Fuel Cells: Flow-field Designs. International Journal
of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 30(4), pp. 359–371
Li, Y., Lv, H., 2018. The Combined Effects of Water Transport on Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Performance. Chemical Engineering Transactions, Volume 65(6), pp. 691–696
Liu, X., Guo, H., Ma, C.,
2006a. Water Flooding and Two-phase Flow in Cathode Channels of
Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. Journal of Power Sources, Volume 156(2), pp. 267–280
Liu, Z., Mao, Z., Wang,
C., 2006b. A Two Dimensional Partial Flooding Model for PEMFC. Journal of Power
Sources, Volume 158(2), pp. 1229–1239
Mulyazmi., Daud, W.R.W., Majlan, E.H., M.I. Rosli., 2013. Water Balance for the
Design of a PEM Fuel Cell System. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,Volume 38(22), pp. 9409–9420
Mulyazmi., Ulfah, M., Octavia, S.,
2017. Improving the Performance of Single Cells in the Design of
Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) when using Hydrogen. International Journal
on Advance Science Engineering Information Technology, Volume 7(2), pp. 53–60
Mulyazmi., Daud, W.R.W., Octavia, S., Ulfah, M., 2018. The Relative Humidity Effect of the Reactants Flows into the Cell
to Increase PEM Fuel Cell Performance. MATEC Web of Conferences, Volume 156(7), pp.1–7
Park, Y.H., Caton, J.A., 2008. An Experimental Investigation of
Electro-Osmotic Drag Coefficients in a Polymer Electrolyte
Membrane Fuel Cell. International Journal
of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 33(24), pp. 7513–7520
Rao, R.M., Bhattacharyya, D., Rengaswamy, R., Choudhury, S.R.,
2007. A Two-dimensional Steady State Model Including the Effect of
Liquid Water for a PEM Fuel Cell Cathode. Journal of Power Sources, Volume 173(1), pp. 375–393
Real,
A.J.D., Arce, A., Bordons, C., 2007. Development and Experimental Validation of a PEM Fuel
Cell Dynamic Model. Journal of Power
Sources, Volume 173(1), pp. 310–324
Spernjak,
D., Prasad, A.K., Advani, S.G.,
2007. Experimental Investigation of Liquid Water Formation and
Transport in a Transparent Single-serpentine PEM Fuel Cell. Journal of Power Sources, Volume 170(2), pp. 334–344
Stumper,
J., Löhr, M., Hamada, S., 2005. Diagnostic
Tools for Liquid Water in PEM Fuel Cells. Journal
of Power Sources, Volume 143(1-2), pp. 150–157
Sun., H., Zhang, G., Guo, L., Dehua, S., Liu, H., 2007. Effects of Humidification Temperatures on Local Current Characteristics in
a PEM Fuel Cell. Journal of Power
Sources, Volume 168(2), pp. 400–407
Yan, W., Chen, C., Mei, S., Soong, C., Cheng, F., 2006. Effects of Operating Conditions on Cell Performance of
PEM Fuel Cells with Conventional or Interdigitated Flow Field. Journal of Power Sources, Volume 162(2), pp. 1157–1164
Yu, X., Zhou, B., Sobiesiak, A.,
2005. Water and Thermal Management for Ballard PEM Fuel Cell Stack. Journal of Power
Sources, Volume 147(1-2), pp. 184–195
Zhou, B., Huang, W., Zong, Y., Sobiesiak, A., 2006. Water and Pressure Effects on a Single PEM Fuel Cell. Journal of Power Sources, Volume 155(2), pp. 190–202
Zong, Yi., Zhou, B., Sobiesiak, A.,
2006. Water and Thermal Management in a Single PEM Fuel Cell with
Non-uniform Stack Temperature. Journal of Power Sources, Volume 161(1), pp. 143–159