Published at : 24 May 2019
Volume : IJtech
Vol 10, No 3 (2019)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v10i3.2918
Siti Jamilatun | Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Jalan Kapas 9, Yogyakarta 55166, Indonesia |
Budhijanto budhijanto | Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jalan Grafika 2, Yogyakarta 55284, Indonesia |
Rochmadi | Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jalan Grafika 2, Yogyakarta 55284, Indonesia |
Avido Yuliestyan | Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Jalan SWK 104, Yogyakarta 55283, Indonesia. |
Arief Budiman | Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Jalan Kapas 9, Yogyakarta 55166, Indonesia |
Spirulina platensis microalgae is one of the feedstocks used in the
production of the third generation of biofuel. The extraction of its lipid for
biodiesel leaves behind a residue, which can be treated by pyrolysis to create
certain other value-added products. This paper discusses the effects of Spirulina platensis residue (SPR) with
respect to grain size (0.105, 0.149 and 0.177 mm), temperature (300 to 600°C) and amount of
catalyst (0, 10, 20 and 40 wt.%) on the characteristics of products (bio-oil,
water phase, char and gas) obtained from pyrolysis in a fixed-bed reactor. The results of the study show that the higher the pyrolysis
temperature, the higher the conversion. For the bio-oil product, the optimum temperature is 500°C, which produces a peak yield of
35.99 wt.%. The larger the grain size, the
lower the bio-oil yield, gas water and gas, for all of the tested temperatures (300–600°C). The amount of catalyst and the pyrolysis temperature greatly influence the
quality of bio-oil products, grouping them into the fractions of LPG (C ? 4),
gasoline (C5–C11), biodiesel (C12–C18) and heavy naphtha (C ? 19). The
tendency for LPG-Gasoline formation
at optimum conditions, considering the use of a 10 wt.% catalyst at a temperature of 400–500°C, was reported.
Alumina silica; Bio-oil pyrolysis; Fixed-bed; Spirulina platensis residue
The massive exploitation of non-renewable natural
resources may pose a threat to lives in the future arising from an increase in associated health issues and the greater risk of
environmental damage that stems from the lower energy reserves and greater release of emissions during
their processing
(Anggorowati et al., 2018; Setyawan et al., 2018). There is thus an urgent
need to replace non-renewable
energy sources with renewable ones. Biomass is
one of the most potent renewable energy sources, with its development having now led to the third
generation of biofuel (Purwanto
et al., 2015; Supramono et al., 2015; Jamilatun et al., 2017a; Kusrini et al., 2018a).
The first-generation biofuels (Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAME) or biodiesel, corn ethanol and sugar alcohol) were produced from lignocellulosic sources in the form of vegetable oils, corn, sugar and others. Although safer from an environmental perspective, a negative impact on food security may have arisen due to competition with food for consumption (Naik et al., 2010; Maity et al., 2014). Different from their predecessors, second-generation biofuels (hydrotreating oil, bio-oil, ethanol from lignocellulose, butanol and alcohol mixtures) were developed to address the aforementioned issue on biofuel production by using non-food lignocellulosic sources such as agricultural residues, forests, grasses, aquatic biomass, etc. Despite not competing for resources with food production as they are derived from renewable resources, and with lower costs of production, the raw material resources used in the first and second generations did require extensive land; hence, biofuel production per area is relatively low (Pradana et al., 2017a; Sudibyo et al., 2017). To that end, microalgae, which requires less land to produce, offers the potential to be developed as a resource for use in the third generation of biofuels (Jamilatun et al., 2017b; Pradana et al., 2017b). Microalgae can be converted into biofuels through either a thermal or biological process. Pyrolysis technology can be utilized to process microalgae into third-generation biofuels (Yuliansyah et al., 2015). The initial process begins with the extraction of Spirulina platensis microalgae to leave behind a solid residue known as Spirulina platensis residue (SPR). The process of pyrolysis can then be applied to convert this low-value material into highly valuable fuel products and chemicals.
Microalgae
pyrolysis is influenced by many parameters, such as the biomass type,
temperature, heating rate, residence time, size and shape, catalyst, etc., as partly reported by Zheng et al. (2018). Temperature
is the most significant of these operating parameters and has a tremendous effect on the product
composition; indeed, pyrolysis is generally carried out at a temperature range of 400–600°C (Kusrini et al., 2018b). Within this temperature range, the liquid phase is mostly produced, which accounts for around 60–70 of the wt.%. However, further increasing
the temperature beyond its optimum will lead to secondary cracking, whereby tar from the primary cracking product will be converted into gas and
char. The effect of secondary cracking is a decline in
bio-oil products and an increase in gas products
(Dickerson & Soria, 2013).
In a fast pyrolysis process, it is generally assumed that
the increase in grain size produces a greater temperature
gradient in the particles. At any given time, the core temperature is lower than that of the surface of
the biomass particles. This can lead to an increase in charcoal, while the amounts of gas and bio-oil decrease. Small particles have an adequate surface area via which to interact
with pyrolysis media to form volatile products, thus enabling them to leave the biomass matrix without
experiencing any secondary reactions. However, in the case of slow pyrolysis, particle size
shows a less significant effect on product yield (Yang et al., 2019).
The presence of an additional catalyst significantly affects the product yield in catalytic pyrolysis. The gas yield increases and charcoal is initially produced, the amount of which is subsequently increased with the addition of the catalyst. In addition, charcoal yield reaches a minimum of 9 wt.% when the mass ratio of the raw material/catalyst is 1:3. The addition of further catalyst increases the catalytic cracking rate, thereby aiding in the formation of gas compounds. Furthermore, the oil yield decreases as the loading of the catalyst increases. This phenomenon occurs due to secondary steam cracks (Qi et al., 2018).
This paper aims to characterize the SPR pyrolysis products (bio-oil, water phase, char and gas) in fixed-bed reactors with various temperatures, SPR grain sizes and number of catalysts used. The ultimate, proximate and calorific values of the raw materials in the form of SPR are analyzed, while the components of the alumina-silica catalyst are analyzed by SEM-EDX (Scanning Electron Microscopy Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Analysis). The pyrolysis products in the form of bio-oil will be analyzed with GC-MS (Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry), with the components then grouped into the fractions of LPG (C ? 4), gasoline (C5-C11), biodiesel (C12-C18) and heavy naphtha (C ? 19).
As a raw
material source in the production of third-generation biofuel, Spirulina platensis residue offers the
potential to be developed on a large scale due to its ease of cultivation,
simple processing pyrolysis technology and low cost. Temperature and the grain size
of SPR microalgae affect the composition of the product. Bio-oil yield will increase from
9.22 to 33.99 wt.% at a
temperature of 300–500°C, then fall to 23.34
wt.% at 600°C with an SPR grain size
of at least 0.105 mm. This positive-peak
curvature trend also
applies to the sizes
of 0.149 and 0.177 mm. However,
the larger the grain size, the lower
the bio-oil yield. An increase in grain size seems to produce a fall in the water phase, gas and its total conversion,
whereas the opposite is shown
for the yield of char. This applies to all temperatures (300–600°C).
The use of a catalyst affects the composition of the product. A greater amount of
catalysts (0–40 wt.%) appears
likely to result in a lower yield of bio-oil and char, with greater amounts of converted product obtained in the gas phase and fairly
constant amounts in the water phase.
Based on the grouping of the number of C atoms in the bio-oil constituent, the dominant fraction
is the LPG-Gasoline
fraction, with methanol being the most highly available
component. In the optimum condition at temperatures of 400–500°C, pyrolysis with the use of 10 wt.% catalyst produced about 45.48–55.31 wt.% of LPG
fraction and 35.70–28.95 wt.% of gasoline fraction.
The author is very grateful
for the funding support from the Ministry of Research,
Technology, and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia. We also gratefully
acknowledge the funding from USAID through the SHERA program – Centre for
Development of Sustainable Region (CDSR) (077/Kontrak/TA/03/2018).
Aysu, T., 2015. Catalytic Pyrolysis of Alcea Pallida Stems in a
Fixed-bed Reactor for Production of Liquid Bio-fuels. Bioresource Technology, Volume 191, pp. 253–262
Anggorowati, H., Jamilatun, S., Rochim, B., Cahyono, Budiman, A., 2018. Effect of Hydrochloric Acid Concentration on the Conversion of Sugarcane Bagasse to Levulinic Acid. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 299, 012092
Dickerson, T., Soria, J., 2013. Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis: A Review. Energy, Volume 6(1), pp. 514–538
Hu, Z., Zheng, Y., Yan, F., Xiao, B., Liu, S., 2013. Bio-oil Production through Pyrolysis of Blue-green Algae Blooms (BGAB): Product Distribution and Bio-oil Characterization. Energy, Volume 52, pp. 119–125
Jalan, R.K., Srivastava, V.K., 1999. Studies on Pyrolysis of a Single Biomass Cylindrical Pellet Kinetic and Heat Transfer Effects. Energy Conversion and Management, Volume 40(5), pp. 467–494
Jamilatun, S., Budiman,
A., Budhijanto, B., Rochmadi, R., 2017a. Non-catalytic Slow Pyrolysis of Spirulina Platensis Residue for
Production of Liquid Biofuel. International
Journal of Renewable Energy Research, Volume 7(4), pp. 1901–1908
Jamilatun,
S., Budhijanto, B., Rochmadi, R. Budiman, A. 2017b. Thermal Decomposition and Kinetic
Studies of Pyrolysis of Spirulina Platensis
Residue. International Journal of
Renewable Energy Development, Volume 6(3), pp. 193–201
Kan, T.,
Strezov, V., Evans, T.J., 2016. Lignocellulosic Biomass Pyrolysis: A Review of Product
Properties and Effects of Pyrolysis Parameters. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 57, pp. 1126–1140
Kusrini, K., Wicaksono, W., Gunawan, C., Daud, N.Z.A., Usman, A., 2018a. Kinetics, Mechanism, and Thermodynamics of Lanthanum Adsorption on Pectin Extracted from Durian Rind. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, Volume 6(5), pp. 6580–6588
Kusrini, K., Supramono, D., Degirmenci,
V., Pranata, S., Bawono, A.A., Ani F.N., 2018b. Improving the Quality of Pyrolysis Oil from Co-firing High-density
Polyethylene Plastic Waste and Palm Empty Fruit Bunches. International Journal of Technology, Volume 9(7), pp. 1498–1508
Maity,
J.P., Bundschuh, J., Chen, C-Y., Bhattacharya, P., 2014. Microalgae for Third Generation
Biofuel Production, Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions
and Wastewater Treatment: Present and Future Perspectives: A Mini Review. Energy, Volume 78, pp. 104–113
Naik,
S.N., Goud, V.V, Rout, P.K., Dalai, A.K., 2010. Production of First and Second Generation
Biofuels: A Comprehensive Review. Renewable
and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 14(2), pp. 578–597
Purwanto, W.W., Supramono, D., Muthia, R., Firdaus, M.F., 2015. Effect of Biomass Types on Bio-oil Characteristics in a Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis
Process
With
a Ni/ZSM-5 Catalyst, International Journal of Technology, Volume 7, pp. 1069-1075
Pradana,
Y.S., Hidayat, A., Prasetya, A., Budiman, A., 2017a. Biodiesel Production in a Reactive
Distillation Column Catalyzed by Heterogeneous Potassium Catalyst. Energy Procedia, Volume 143, pp. 742–747
Pradana,
Y.S., Kusumastuti, Y., Rahma, F.N., Effendy, N., 2017b. Chitosan Flocculation-Sedimentation
for Harvesting Selected Microalgae Species Grown in Monoculture and Mixed Cultures.
Chemical Engineering Transactions,
Volume 56, pp. 1549–1554
Qi,
P., Changa, G., Wang, H., Zhang, X., Guo, Q., 2018.
Production of Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Catalytic
Co-pyrolysis of Microalgae
and Polypropylene using HZSM-5.
Journal of Analytical and
Applied Pyrolysis, Volume 136, pp. 178–185
Supramono,
D., Devina, Y.M., Tristantini, D., 2015. Effect of Heating Rate of Torrefaction
of Sugarcane Bagasse on its Physical Characteristics. International Journal of Technology, Volume 6(7),
pp. 1084–1093
Sudibyo,
H., Purwanti, Y., Pradana, Y.S., Samudra, T.T., Budiman, A., Suyono, E.A.,
2017. Modification of Growth Medium of Mixed-culture Species of Microalgae
Isolated from Southern Java Coastal Region In:
MATEC Web of Conference, Volume 154
Setyawan,
M., Budiman, A., Mulyono, P., Sutijan, 2018. Optimum Extraction of Algae-oil
from Microalgae using Hydrodynamic Cavitation. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, Volume 8(1), pp.
451–458
Sun, Y., Zhou, W.,
Wangd, H., Guo, G., Su, Z., Pua, Y., 2018. Antialgal Compounds with Antialgal Activity
Against the Common Red Tide Microalgae from a Green Algae Ulva Pertusa, Ecotoxicol Environ. Safe, Volume 157, pp.
61–66
Yuliansyah, A.T., Prasetya,
A., Ramadhan, M.A.A., Laksono, R., 2015. Pyrolysis of Plastic Waste to Produce
Pyrolytic Oil as an Alternative Fuel.
International Journal of Technology, Volume 6(7), pp. 1076–1083
Yang, C.,
Li, R., Zhang, B., Qiu, Q.,
Wang, B., Yang, H., Ding, Y., Wang, C., 2019.
Pyrolysis of Microalgae: A Critical Review. Fuel Processing Technology,
Volume 186, pp. 53–72
Zheng, Y., Tao, L., Yang, X., Huang, Y., Liu, C., Zheng, Z., 2018. Study of the Thermal Behavior, Kinetics, and Product Characterization of Biomass and Low-density Polyethylene Co-pyrolysis by Thermogravimetric Analysis and Pyrolysis-GC/MS. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, Volume 133, pp. 185–197