• Vol 9, No 8 (2018)
  • Industrial Engineering

Sustainable Manufacturing Practices among SMEs in Malaysia

Norsiah Hami, Fadhilah Mat Yamin, Shafini Mohd Shafie, Mohd Razali Muhamad, Zuhriah Ebrahim


Published at : 30 Dec 2018
IJtech : IJtech Vol 9, No 8 (2018)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v9i8.2751

Cite this article as:
Hami, N., Yamin, F.M., Shafie, S.M., Muhamad, M.R., Ebrahim, Z., 2018. Sustainable Manufacturing Practices among SMEs in Malaysia. International Journal of Technology. Volume 9(8), pp. 1658-1667
62
Downloads
Norsiah Hami School of Technology Management and Logistics, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
Fadhilah Mat Yamin School of Technology Management and Logistics, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
Shafini Mohd Shafie School of Technology Management and Logistics, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
Mohd Razali Muhamad Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia
Zuhriah Ebrahim Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia
Email to Corresponding Author

Abstract
image

Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) play a significant role in the economic development of Malaysia, accounting for approximately 97.3% of businesses in the country. While there is a plethora of studies which examine the commitments of large and multinational firms towards business sustainability, little is known about the efforts of SMEs to translate their strategic orientation towards environmental and social sustainability into action. It is important to examine the extent of SMEs’ response to the imperatives of becoming sustainable businesses through the implementation of sustainable manufacturing practice (SMP) in their business operations. The purpose of this paper is to determine the extent of the implementation of SMP among SMEs in Malaysia. Analysing survey data from 127 SMEs, the results show that the extent of the implementation of SMP among them is low to moderate. This implies that although environmental initiatives are becoming important nowadays, there is still a lack of implementation of SMP in the operational and business activities of SMEs in Malaysia. As well as offering some insights into SMP, particularly in the context of SMEs, this study provides a useful reference for salient stakeholders, such as the government and industrial practitioners, for making decisions and taking further action related to the strategies of nurturing, implementing and enforcing environmental protection and social well-being.

 

 

Manufacturing industry; SMEs; Survey; Sustainability; Sustainable manufacturing practice

Introduction

Small and medium enterprises (SMEs), which account for a large proportion of businesses, play a significant role in the economic development of developing countries (Koe et al., 2015). In Malaysia, they contributed 32.5% of gross domestic product (GDP), 19% of exports, and 57% of employment (Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2011). SME GDP has grown annually, growing by 6.1% in 2015, despite a slight decrease compared to the 7.9% growth recorded in 2014 (SME Corporation Malaysia, 2016). Unfortunately, while contributing to positive economic values, SMEs have also caused negative effects from their operational and business activities, such as environmental damage (Koe et al., 2015). As argued by Berawi (2016), the challenge for any country is to continue its economic growth and to provide welfare, while ensuring environmental sustainability. In line with the national agenda to become a developed nation, it is crucial for Malaysian SMEs to improve their economic performance at the same time as protecting the natural environment and enhancing social well-being.  

Sustainable manufacturing practice (SMP) is one of the essential approaches to handling environmental degradation and other sustainability issues. A central principle underlying SMP is its relationship with the sustainability performance of a firm. Recent studies on sustainability management have acknowledged the contributions of SMP to sustainability performance in terms of its abilities to generate greater economic, environmental and social sustainability in firms. 

Recognising its importance as a platform for surviving in intense global competition, many manufacturers have increasingly begun to promote and implement sustainable initiatives and practices. Despite the abundance of studies investigating the commitment and initiatives of large and multinational firms towards sustainability in business, little is known about the efforts of SMEs to put their sustainability goals into practice. It is important to determine how well they respond to the imperatives of becoming sustainable businesses, as many firms remain confused about whether and how they should internalize natural environmental and social considerations into their core business operations.

Recently, Khatri and Metri (2016) claimed that SMEs are slow to implement sustainable practice. Developing a sustainable SME business is a great challenge due to the lack of certain important aspects such as innovation and technology, human capital development, market access, access to financing, legal and regulatory frameworks, infrastructure and security (Hashim, 2013). Laurinkeviciute and Stasiskiene (2011) found that SMEs in Lithuania often did not implement any practical measures to reduce their environmental impact. However, examining the environmental practice adoption among SMEs in the manufacturing industry in Auckland, Cassells and Lewis (2011) found that majority of the responding firms did consider the environmental impact of their business activities. Hence, it can be concluded that the responsibility of SMEs to be environmentally friendly and socially responsible is still questionable.

In Malaysia, several studies have been conducted on the implementation of sustainable manufacturing practice in SMEs. Most of these have tended to focus on specific contexts, such as green practice (e.g. Wooi & Zailani, 2010; Yahya et al., 2014) or social responsibility practice (e.g. Nejati & Amran, 2013; Yusoff & Adamu, 2016). Therefore, by considering sustainable manufacturing practice in a wider context, including both environmental and socially responsible practices, this paper aims to examine the extent of the implementation of SMP among SMEs in the Malaysian manufacturing sector.

The following section explains the concepts of sustainability, sustainable manufacturing, stakeholder theory and SMP, and is followed in Section 3 by an explanation of the research method employed. The results of the study are presented and further discussed in Section 4. The paper concludes with the implications, and recommendations for expanding the scope of the study in future research.

Conclusion

Empirical evidence from previous studies emphasizes that better economic performance of manufacturing firms, together with environmental and social sustainability, can be achieved by implementing SMP. This study has examined the extent of the implementation of SMP among SMEs in the Malaysian manufacturing sector. In general, the results of the analysis reveal that they have adopted a proactive approach to SMP in their operational and business activities, but at a low to moderate extent of implementation. Considering the uniqueness of SMEs, especially micro and small manufacturers, the lack of resources, organizational management and financial stability may explain the reasons for the insufficient implementation of pollution prevention approaches, such as cleaner production and eco-efficiency, as well as socially responsible practices related to employees, customers and suppliers. Customer-oriented sustainable practice is the most common type of sustainable practice implemented by the responding firms, followed by customer relations, cleaner production, eco-efficiency and supplier relations.

The study provides data and information regarding the current status of SMP implemented by SMEs in Malaysia and will a useful reference for salient stakeholders such as the government and industrial practitioners when making decisions and taking further action related to the strategies of nurturing, implementing and enforcing environmental protection and social well-being. Since this study is descriptive in nature and is focused on sustainable practices, it is suggested that future research should study the relationship or the impact of these practices on the sustainability performance of firms.

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia for funding this study under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS), S/O code 13261, and the Research and Innovation Management Centre, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah for the administration of the study.

References

Berawi, M.A., 2016. Accelerating Sustainable Infrastructure Development: Assuring Well-being and Ensuring Environmental Sustainability. International Journal of Technology, Volume 7(4), pp. 527–529

Bhanot, N., Rao, P.V., Deshmukh, S.G., 2015. Sustainable Manufacturing: An Interaction Analysis for Machining Parameters using Graph Theory. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 189, pp. 57–63

Cassells, S., Lewis, K., 2011. SMEs and Environmental Responsibility: Do Actions Reflect Attitudes?. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Volume 18(3), pp. 186–199

Ditlev-Simonsen, C.D., Wenstøp, F., 2013. How Stakeholders View Stakeholders as CSR Motivators. Social Responsibility Journal, Volume 9(1), pp. 137–147

DOSM (Department of Statistics Malaysia), 2011. SME Census 2011: Economic Census 2011

Freeman, E., Phillips, R., 2002. Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, Volume 12(3), pp. 331–349

Freeman, R.E., 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston

Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L. Figge, F., 2016. Ambidexterity for Corporate Social Performance. Organization Studies, Volume 37(2), pp. 213–235

Hami, N., 2015. Sustainable Manufacturing Practice and Sustainability Performance Mediated by Innovation Performance. PhD Dissertation, FKP, UTeM, Malacca

Hami, N., Yamin, F.M., Shafie, S.M., Muhamad, M.R., 2017. An Analysis of Sustainable Manufacturing Practices in Malaysian SMEs, In: ISoRIS 2017, Malacca, Malaysia

Hashim, H., 2013. Overview of SME Sector in Malaysia. In: the Malaysia-India SME Forum, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Hsu, C.H., Chang, A.Y., Luo, W., 2017. Identifying Key Performance Factors for Sustainability Development of SMEs: Integrating QFD and Fuzzy MADM Methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 161, pp. 629–645

Jayal, A.D., Badurdeen, F., Dillon, O.W., Jawahir, I.S., 2010. Sustainable Manufacturing: Modeling and Optimization Challenges at the Product, Process and System Levels. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, Volume 2(3), pp. 144–152

Khatri, J.K., Metri, B., 2016. SWOT-AHP Approach for Sustainable Manufacturing Strategy Selection: A Case of Indian SME. Global Business Review, Volume 17(5), pp. 1211–1226

Kim, S.T., 2010. Implementation of Green Supply Chain Management: Impact on Performance Outcomes in Small and Medium-Sized Electrical and Electronic Firms. PhD Dissertation, Nebraska University, USA

Koe, W.L., Omar, R., Sa’ari, J.R., 2015. Factors Influencing Propensity to Sustainable Entrepreneurship of SMEs in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 172, pp. 570–577

Korhonen, J., 2000. Completing the Industrial Ecology Cascade Chain in the Case of a Paper Industry: SME Potential in Industrial Ecology. Eco-Management and Auditing, Volume 7(1), pp. 11–20

Laurinkeviciute, A., Stasiskiene, Z., 2011. SMS for Decision Making of SMEs. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, Volume 13(6), pp. 797–807

Moorthy, M.K., Yakob, P., Chelliah, M.K., Arokiasamy, L., 2012. Drivers for Malaysian SMEs to Go Green. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Volume 2(9), pp. 74–86

Nejati, M., Amran, A., 2013. Corporate Social Responsibility Terminologies in Small Businesses: Insights from Malaysia. Business Strategy Series, Volume 14(1), pp. 11–14

OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2010. Eco-innovation in Industry: Enabling Green Growth

Omar, R., Samuel, R., 2011. Environmental Management amongst Manufacturing Firms in Malaysia. In: 3rd Int. Symposium & Exhibition in Sustainable Energy & Environment, Malacca, Malaysia

Raja Ghazilla, R.A., Sakudarini, N., Abdul-Rashid, S.H., Ayub, N.S., Olugu, E.U., Musa, S.N., 2015. Drivers and Barriers Analysis for Green Manufacturing Practices in Malaysian SMEs: A Preliminary Findings. Procedia CIRP, Volume 26, pp. 658–663

Ramayah, T., Leen, J., Marimuthu, M., Omar, A., Mohamad, O., 2013. Green Manufacturing Practices and Performance among SMEs: Evidence from a Developing Nation. USA: IGI-Global

SME Corporation Malaysia, 2016. SME Annual Report 2015/2016, SME Corp. Malaysia

Szekely, F., Knirsch, M., 2005. Responsible Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility: Metrics for Sustainable Performance. European Management Journal, Volume 23(6), pp. 628–647

Wong, B.Y.L., More, E., 2016. Management of Corporate Social Responsibility in Hong Kong Small and Medium Enterprises. Journal of Global Responsibility, Volume 7(2), pp. 146–162

Wooi, G.C., Zailani, S., 2010. Green Supply Chain Initiatives: Investigation on the Barriers in the Context of SMEs in Malaysia. International Business Management, Volume 4(1), pp. 20–27

Yahya, N., Nair, S.R., Piaralal, S.K., 2014. Green Practices Adoption Framework for Small and Medium Sized Logistics Firms in Malaysia. Sains Humanika, Volume 2(3), pp. 79–84

Yusoff, W.F.W., Adamu, M.S., 2016. The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Evidence from Malaysia. International Business Management, Volume 10(4), 345–351