• Vol 9, No 4 (2018)
  • Civil Engineering

Cross-Party Collaboration to Reduce Construction Waste to Design-Build Projects

Afrizal Nursin, Yusuf Latief, Krishna Muchtar


Cite this article as:
Nursin, A., Latief, Y., Muchtar, K., Soeparto H.G., 2018. Cross-Party Collaboration to Reduce Construction Waste to Design-Build Projects. International Journal of Technology. Volume 9(4), pp. 751-765
18
Downloads
Afrizal Nursin - Engineering Faculty,University of Indonesia
-
Yusuf Latief Engineering Faculty University of Indonesia
Krishna Muchtar Engineering Faculty University of Indonesia
Email to Corresponding Author

Abstract
image

Waste in the construction industry is a severe problem in various countries in the world, including in Indonesia. Several studies on construction projects over the last three years have found that the Construction Waste (CW) tendency has increased significantly. The objective of this study is to identify existing CW in design-build project and how it can be reduced by increasing collaboration between the stakeholders involved in such projects. The survey method is used to explore and find solutions to the CW problems, and to reduce it by increasing collaboration. Data were obtained from 127 respondents working on a design-build construction project, then processed by using the SEM-PLS 3.0 Professional program to estimate the causal-predictive relationships between stakeholder, culture, communication, conflict, and the collaborative variables that affect the reduction in construction waste on design-build project. A collaborative model between the parties implemented by managing those involved, understanding the culture, minimizing conflict and improving communication, can reduce both physical waste and non-physical construction waste.

Collaboration; Conflict; Construction waste; Design-build

Introduction

Collaboration involves parties with various interests working together to achieve the desired outcome with the ultimate goal of mutual satisfaction. In the interests of the parties, there is an interest, where the explanation of interest is what is cared for or desired by each party. Many names or titles know collaboration. Some popular names include "problem solving", "consensus", "desire-based negotiation", "win/win", "mutual benefit", and "principled negotiation".  (Fisher et al., 1991;  Burgess & Burgess, 1997). The purpose of the collaboration is to manage cooperation in a multi-stakeholder, more constructive activity, where the outcome fosters effective communication in problem-solving and enhances relationships among the parties (Coser, 1956). Collaboration is everywhere its presence in our lives is a permanent feature of modern society; Work is always social in the sense that objects and subjects, end and understood, reason and need, application and ability, are form of social mediation (Harshada et al., 2011).

One of the recommendations presented by Berawi (2017) to improve infrastructure development strategies and programs, is to enhance the role of universities in collaborating with governments and industry to strengthen planning and development of infrastructure and connectivity programs. This means that in the future the problem of collaboration in infrastructure development is fundamental (Berawi, 2017).

In this paper, the collaboration is aimed at reducing Construction Waste (CW) which is a crucial issue in the construction industry environment. CW is considered at an early stage of the project, by all parties involved in the development process (Poon, 2007). A simplified approach emerging in controlling CWs is to use environmentally friendly construction methods. That aim to reduce waste generation during construction stages, such as using panel systems, applying prefabricated components and reducing the use of natural materials  (Peng et al., 1997). Support for cutting CW is one of the best and most efficient methods to minimize its growth and eliminate many of its associated problems. Therefore, in construction projects with uncertain, a high degree of confidence and collaboration can lead to increased efficiency (Kadefors, 2004).

The various aspects of residential construction, design, use, and destruction can have a significant impact on the environment. Sustainable development is impossible without sustainable buildings and housing. Cultural issues of the sections to consider in the process, as explained that sustainable housing development can be understood on ecological, economic, technological, cultural and social sustainability (Bakar et al., 2011).

The problem and research question for this study are: what collaboration between the parties can be applied to the Designed Build project to reduce CW?

In detail there are four questions to be studied, namely:

a)      RQ1: What is the platform for creating collaboration of parties on the Design-Build project?

b)      RQ2: What is the significance of various stakeholders in the Design-Build project?

c)      RQ3: Do communication and conflict affect the implementation of collaboration?

d)      RQ4: Does the collaboration model affect the reduction of construction waste?

Conclusion

From the results of the discussion, it can be concluded several things as follows: (1) The primary foundation for creating successful stakeholder collaboration on the Designed-Build project consists of how to manage stakeholders, recognize and understand the cultural dimensions of both ethnic and corporate culture, understand conflict management and resolve conflicts when they occur, and maintain effective communication and tailored to the needs of the Design-Build project; (2) The importance of stakeholders in the case of the Design-Build project, judging by the conditions under which stakeholders deeply influence the culture that enables them to facilitate collaborative design-build projects.. Then to the stakeholders or parties involved in the Design Plan project is very prominent on communication and conflict, communication management related to the Design-Build project is very helpful in facilitating the flow of communication between the parties so that errors in communication can be minimized. The potential for conflict of stakeholders is very significant, therefore in the design project need to be wary of the conflict, so that the management of stakeholders is essential in the project Design-Build; (3) Communication and conflict affect the implementation of collaboration, where culture affects communication and conflict. Thus the potential for conflict in the collaboration of cultural background both ethnic culture and corporate culture can be avoided maximally; and (4) Collaboration model influences the reduction of construction waste, both physical construction waste and non-physical construction waste. The influence is very significant indicated by the statistic value of t = 9.817 for physical construction waste and t = 9.341 for non-physical construction waste.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the financial support provided by University of Indonesia through the PITTA 2017 funding scheme under Grant number 861/UN2.R3.1/HKP.05.00/2017 Managed by the Directorate for Research and Public Services (DRPM) University of Indonesia.

References

Ackermann, F., Eden, C., 2010. Strategic Management of Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Long Range Planning, Volume 44(3), pp. 179–196

Alwi, S., Hampson, K., Mohamed, S., 2002. Non Value-Adding Activities in Australian Construction Projects. In: International Conference on Advancement in Design, Construction, Construction Management and Maintenance of Building Structure, Bali, 2728 March, Indonesia

Bakar, A. H. A., Cheen, K. S., Rahmawaty., 2011. Sustainable Housing Practices in Malaysian Housing Development: Towards Establishing Sustainability Index. International Journal of Technology, Volume 2(1), pp. 84–93

Baum, H., Katz, A., 2011. A Novel Methodology to Estimate the Evolution of Construction Waste in Construction Sites. Journal of Waste Management, Volume 31(2), pp. 353–358

Berawi, M.A., 2017. Designing National Policy and Strategies for Inclusive Development: Accelerating Infrastructure Development for Growth and Prosperity. International Journal of Technology, Volume 8(5), pp. 773–776

Bossink, B.A.G., Brouwers, H.J.H., 1996. Construction Waste: Quantification and Source Evaluation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Volume 122(1), pp. 55–60

Burgess, H., Burgess, G.M., 1997. Encyclopedia of Conflict Resolution. ABC-CLIO, Inc., Santa Barbara, California

Caltrans, 2007. Project Communication Handbook. Office of Project Management Process Improvement, 1120 N Street, Mail Station 28, Sacramento, CA 95814

Construction Industry Institute, 2018. Design/Build (Archived). Available online at https://www.construction-institute.org/resources/knowledgebase/knowledge-areas/procurement-contracts/topics/rt-133

Coser, L.A., 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. The Free Press, New York, USA

Edah, J., 2009. Analisis Hubungan Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Kompetensi Komunikasi dalam Organigasasi. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, Volume 6(4), pp. 370–380 (in Bahasa)

Egan, J., 1998. Rethinking Construction: The Report of the Construction Task Force. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions and HMSO, London, United Kingdom, England

Elmarsafi, G.M., 2008. Interorganizational Collaboration: Transformation Strategies to Reduce Construction Disputes in the Construction Industry. ProQuest LLC, Capella University, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Erwin, M., 2012. Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Republik Indonesia. PT Refika Aditama, Bandung, Indonesia, pp. 48–50 (in Bahasa)

Fisher, R., Ury, W.L., Patton, B., 1991. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In. Penguin Books, New York, USA

Forbes, L.H., Ahmed, S.M., 2011. Modern Construction: Lean Project Delivery and Integrated Practices. CRC Press: Taylor and Francis Group, New York, USA

Gadde, L.E., Håkansson, H., 1993. Professional Purchasing. London Routledge, London, United Kingdom, England

Gustavsson, T.K., Gohary, H., 2012. Boundary Action in Construction Projects: New Collaborative Project Practices. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Volume 5(3), pp. 364–376

Hao, J.L.L, Hills, M.J., Shen, L.Y., 2008. Managing Construction Waste On?site through System Dynamics Modelling: The Case of Hong Kong. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Volume 15(2), pp.103113

Harshada, P., Pettitt, M., Wilson, J.R., 2011. Factors of Collaborative Working: A Framework for Collaboration Model. Applied Ergonomics, Volume 43(1), pp. 126

Hofstede, G., 2017. Get Hofstede. Available online at https://geert-hofstede.com/

Jepsen, A.L., Eskerod, P., 2009. Stakeholder Analysis in Projects: Challenges in using Current Guidelines in the Real World. International Journal of Project Management, Volume 27, pp. 335–343

Kadefors, A., 2004. Trust in Project Relationships - Inside the Black Box. International Journal of Project Management, Volume 22(3), pp. 175–182

Koentjaraningrat, 2009. Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Erlangga, Jakarta, Indonesia (in Bahasa)

Kofoworola, O.F., Gheewala, S.H., 2009. Estimation of Construction Waste Generation and Management in Thailand. Journal of Waste Management, Volume 29(2), pp. 731–738

Nagapan, S., Rahman, I.A., Asmi, A., 2012. Factors Contributing to Physical and Non-physical Waste Generation in Construction Industry. International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences (IJAAS), Volume 1(1), pp. 1–10

Nicolajsen, H.W., 2007. ICT Use in Inter-organizational Collaboration: The Field of Construction. In: Proceedings of the 30th Information System Research Seminar. Scandinavia: IRIS

Peng, C.L., Scorpio, D.E., Kibert, C.J., 1997. Strategies for Successful Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Operations. Constructtion Management and Economics, Volume 15(1), pp. 49–58

Pondy, L.R., 2012. Organizational Conflict: Concepts and Models. Administrative Science Quarterly, Volume 12(2), pp. 296320

Poon, C.S., 2007. Reducing Construction Waste. Waste Management, Volume 27(2), pp. 1715–1716

Schifrin, M., 2001. Partner or Perish. Forbes, pp. 26–28

Schmeer, K., 1999. Health Reform Tools Series: Guidelines for Conducting a Stakeholder Analysis. Partnerships for Health Reform Publication, Abt Associates, Inc., Bethesda, USA

Shen, L.Y., Tam, V.W.Y., Tam, C.M., Drew, D.S., 2004. Mapping Approach for Examining Waste Management on Construction Sites. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Volume 130(4), pp. 472–481

Shenkar, O., Yan, A., 2002. Failure as a Consequence of Partner Politics: Learning from the Life and Death of an International Cooperative Venture. Human Relations, Volume 55(5), pp. 565–601

Tam, V.W., Tam, C.M., 2008. Waste Reduction through Incentives: A Case Study. Building Research and Information Journal, Volume 36(1), pp. 37–43

Vaaland, T.I., 2004. Improving Project Collaboration: Start with the Conflicts. International Journal of Project Management, Volume 22(6), pp. 447–454

Xue, Z. X., Ruixue, Y., Rabecca, J., Dai, J., 2014. Innovation in Construction:, A Critical Review and Future Research. International Journal of Innovation Science, Volume 6(2), pp. 111–126

Yasamis, F., Arditi, D., Mohammadi, J., 2002. Assessing Contractor Quality Performance. Construction Management and Economics, Volume 20(3), pp. 211–223

Yin, R.K., 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publication, London, United Kingdom, England