Intercity Mode Choice Modelling: Considering the Intracity Transport Systems with Application to the Jakarta-Bandung Corridor
Corresponding email: lita_barus@yahoo.com
Published at : 29 Apr 2016
Volume : IJtech
Vol 7, No 4 (2016)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v7i4.2798
Barus, L.S., & Flores, H.M.& Hadiwardoyo, S.P.& Batoz, J.L. 2016. Intercity Mode Choice Modelling: Considering the Intracity Transport Systems with Application to the Jakarta-Bandung Corridor. International Journal of Technology. Volume 7(4), pp.581-591
| Lita Sari Barus | Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia |
| Hipolito Martell Flores | Génie des Systèmes Urbains, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, AVENUES Laboratoire, Centre Pierre Guillaumat, BP 60319 – 60203 COMPIEGNE cedex– France |
| Sigit Pranowo Hadiwardoyo | Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia |
| Jean Louis Batoz | Génie des Systèmes Urbains, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, AVENUES Laboratoire, Centre Pierre Guillaumat, BP 60319 – 60203 COMPIEGNE cedex– France |
The choice among modes of intercity transport depends on conditions of not only intercity transport modes but also intracity transport in both the departure city and the arrival city. Intracity transport conditions might be advantageous for one intercity mode and disadvantageous for others. Intercity and intracity transport conditions are complex and need to be approached systemically. This study proposes an approach based on the passengers’ preferences. The logit model was adapted to evaluate the transport modes’ choices in competition. This model is called the “Adapted Mixed Multinomial Logit Model” (AMML). It was applied on the Jakarta-Bandung corridor in both directions. It contributes to a complete approach for intercity transport mode choice by considering the influence of the intracity transport conditions in both the departure and arrival cities. The results proved that the choice of intercity transport mode depends not only on its own quality of service but also, importantly, on that of the intracity transport systems.
Adapted Mixed Multinomial Logit Model, Intercity Transport, Intracity Transport, Modal Choice, Modal Competition
Ahern, A.A., Tapley, N., 2008. The Use of Stated Preference Techniques to Model Modal Choices on Interurban Trips in Ireland. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Volume 42(1), pp. 15-27
Aydin, G., Dzhaleva-Chonkova, A., 2013. Discussions on Rail in Urban Areas and Rail History. Research in Transportation Economics, Volume 41(1), pp 84-88
Barus, L.S., 2015. Contribution to the Intercity Modal Choice considering the Intracity Transport Systems: Application of an Adapted Mixed Multinomial Logit Model for the Jakarta-Bandung Corridor. Doctoral Thesis, Double Degree Program, Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia and Université de Technologie de Compiégne, France
Behrends, S. 2012. The Urban Context of Intermodal Road-rail Transport – Threat or Opportunity for Modal Shift? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 39, pp. 463–475
Ben-Akiva, M., Lerman, S.R., 1985. In: Irawan, M. Z., Tomonori S., 2013. Modeling Travel Mode Choice: Application of Discrete-Continuous Model (A Case of Traveler in Yogyakarta, Indonesia). In: Proceedings of the Eastern Society for Transportation Studies, Volume 9
Chandra, S., Bari, M.E., Devarasetty, P.C., Vadali, S., 2013. Accessibility Evaluations of Feeder Transit Services. Transportation Research, Volume 52(C), pp. 47–63
Hu, B., Shao, J., Palta, M., 2006. Pseudo-R2 in Logistic Regression Model. Statistica Sinica, Volume 16, pp. 847?860
Koffman, D., 2004. Operational Experience with Flexible Transit Service, Transportation Research Cooperative Research Program (TCRP), Report 53, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, USA
Lind, D.A., Marchal, W.G., Wathen, S.A., 2007. Statistical Techniques in Business and Economics with Global Data Sets, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA
McFadden, D., Train, K., 2000. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, Volume 15, pp. 447–470
Paha, J., Rompf, D., Warnecke, C., 2013. Customer Choice Patterns in Passenger Rail Competition. Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice, Volume 50(C), pp. 209–227
Potts, J.F., Marshall, M.A., Crockett, E.C., Washington, J., 2010. A Guide for Planning and Operating Flexible Public Transportation Services, Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 140, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA
Prasertsubpakij, D., Nitivattananon, V., 2012. Evaluating Accessibility to Bangkok Metro Systems using Multi-dimensional Criteria Across User Groups. IATSS Research, Volume 36(1), pp 56–65
Presidential Decree No 44/1997 Subject to Metropolitan Mass Public Transport Network, Jakarta, Indonesia
Reis, V., Meier, J.F., Pace, G., Palacin, R., 2013. Rail and Multi-modal Transport. Research in Transportation Economics, Volume 41(1), pp.17–30
Tamin, O.Z., 2000. Perencanaan dan Pemodelan Transportasi. Penerbit ITB, Bandung, Indonesia [in Bahasa]
Van der Ven, J., 2010. Potensi Pasar Kereta Api di Indonesia. Indonesian Infrastructure Initiative, Australia Indonesia Partnership, Jakarta, Indonesia, pp. 3–5
Walpole, R.E., Myers, R.H., 2012. Ilmu Peluang dan Statistika untuk Insinyur dan Ilmuwan. Edisi Keempat, Penerbit ITB, Bandung, Indonesia [in Bahasa]
Wu, K., Mao, B., Wang, Y., Sun, Q., 2013. Intercity Rail Transport Pricing Strategy Based on Efficacy Coefficient Method. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, Volume 13(3), pp. 105?110