Published at : 29 Apr 2016
Volume : IJtech
Vol 7, No 4 (2016)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v7i4.2083
Rizki, M., Karsaman, R.H., & Santoso, I.Frazila, R.B., 2016. Route Divert Behavior in Jakarta Electronic Road Pricing Policy Implementation. International Journal of Technology. Volume 7(4), pp.571-580
Muhamad Rizki | Highway Engineering and Development, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesha 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia |
Rudy Hermawan Karsaman | Highway Engineering and Development, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesha 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia |
Idwan Santoso | Highway Engineering and Development, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesha 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia |
Russ Bona Frazila | Highway Engineering and Development, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesha 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia |
The effectiveness of transportation demand management policy depends on how commuters respond to it. This study attempts to comprehend commuter behavior in choosing routes based on electronic road pricing (ERP) policy implementation on the Sudirman and Kuningan corridors. The experiments were conducted using the data collections from a stated preference experiment in which each commuter makes a route choice with an alternative representing a hypothetical situation with a combination of tariffs and travel time in ERP policy implementation. Logit models found that the individual and household variables influence route divert behavior. A commuter with a higher income or more family members living together is more likely to have less flexibility in diverting route. In addition, the distance of the trips affected their route divert behavior and influenced an individual trip chain constrained in time-space prism.
Electronic road pricing, Route choice, Stated preference, Transport demand management, Travel behavior
Ben-Akiva, M., Lerman, S.R., 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma
Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D., Gärling, T., Gopinath, D., Walker, J., Bolduc, D., Börsch-Supan, A., Delquié, P., Larichev, O., Morikawa, T., Polydoropoulou, A., Rao, V., 1999. Extended Framework for Modeling Choice Behavior. Marketing Letters, Volume 10(3), pp. 187–203
Brunow, S., Gründer, M., 2013. The Impact of Activity Chaining on the Duration of Daily Activities. Transportation, Volume 40, pp. 981–1001
Gärling, T., 2005. Changes of Private Car Use in Response to Travel Demand Management. Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and Application. Proceedings of the ICTTP. Oxford: Elsevier
Greene, W., 2008. Models for Discrete Choice. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson–Prentice Hall
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis, Sixth edition. New York, NY: Pearson–Prentice Hall
Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M., Greene, W., 2005. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S., 2000. Special Topics: Multinomial Logit. Applied Logistics Regression. New York: John Wiley and Sons
Jaensirisak, S., Wardman, M., May, A.D., 2005. Explaining Variations in Public Acceptability of Road Pricing Schemes. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Volume 39(2), pp. 127–153
Kacker, R.N., Lagergren, E.S., Filliben, J.J., 1991. Taguchi’s Orthogonal Arrays are Classical Designs of Experiments. Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Volume 96(5), pp. 577–591
Kitamura, R., 1988. An Evaluation of Activity-based Travel Analysis. Transportation, Volume 15(1–2), pp. 9–34
Koppelman, F.S., Bhat, C., 2006. A Self Instructing Course in Mode Choice Modeling: Multinomial and Nested Logit Models. US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, 31
Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., Swait, J.D., 2000. Stated Choice Method: Analysis and Application, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Mahendra, A., 2008. Institutional Perspectives on Road Pricing: Essay on Implementation, Response, and Adaptation. Dissertation for Urban and Regional Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
McFadden, D., 1973. Conditional Logit Analysis for Qualitative Choice Behavior. Available online at: http://eml.berkeley.edu/reprints/mcfadden/zarembka.pdf
McNally, M.G., Rindt, C.R., 2007. The Activity-based Approach. UCI-ITS-AS-WP-07-1, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Irvine, CA
Polak, J., Jones, P., 1997. Using Stated-preference Methods to Examine Traveller Preferences and Responses. In Stopher and Lee-Gooselin, ed. Understanding Travel Behaviour in an Era of Change
Rose, J.M., Bliemer, M.C.J., 2012. Sample Optimality in the Design of Stated Choice Experiments. In: Pendyala, R. and C. Bhat, ed. Travel behavior research in the evolving world, IATBR, India, pp. 119–145
Seik, F.T., 2000. An Advanced Demand Management Instrument in Urban Transport: Electronic Road Pricing in Singapore. Volume 17(1), Pergamon
Small, K., Gomez-Ibañez, J.A., 1998. Road Pricing for Congestion Management: The Transition from Theory to Policy. Available online at: http://www.uctc.net/papers/391.pdf
Susilo, Y.O., 2005. The Short Term Variability and the Long Term Changes of Individual Spatial Behavior in Urban Areas. Dissertation for Department of Urban Management Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto
Washbrook, K., Haider, W., Jaccard, M., 2006. Estimating Commuter Mode Choice: A Discrete Choice Analysis of the Impact of Road Pricing and Parking Charges. Springer, Transportation, Volume 33, pp. 621–639
Yamamoto, T., Fujii, S., Kitamura, R., Yoshida, H., 2000. An Analysis of Time Allocation, Departure Time, and Route Choice Behavior under Congestion Pricing. 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.